Idea → Challenge

Public access is not the same as affected-party participation

Text questioned in version 1

public comment

Open publication can still exclude people with limited time, connectivity, or institutional access.

Opened by demo_noor ·

Resolution

Suggested wording was used in version 2. Read the resulting version.

Discussion and suggested changes, in order

Conversation

3 entries
  1. demo_noor suggested wording · · Used

    public comment by people materially affected

    Reasoning

    The branch should measure participation by affected communities, not merely whether a web form was open.

    Used by demo_mei. Accepted as the defining emphasis of this fork. Read version 2.
  2. demo_ravi replied ·

    In emergencies, identifying every affected group may itself delay action.

  3. demo_mei replied ·

    The wording requires participation, not unanimity. Urgent action can still document who could not be reached.

Branches from the questioned version

Create a branch

No branch starts from this version yet.